Microsoft And Carnegie Mellon Will Train Junior Engineers For AI Coding
Microsoft published a post on October 15, 2026 announcing PRAISE, an internal training program for junior software engineers. Everything below comes from that page.
Transcript
Microsoft started a program for junior engineers, it says. The post states it is called PRAISE.
Microsoft writes that the internal program pairs junior and senior engineers. Company executives wrote it, per that page.
The announcement explains that nursing inspired the pairing. New nurses are paired with experienced nurses, the article notes.
The company reports a curriculum partnership with Carnegie Mellon University. Junior engineers will take those classes, the page adds.
The authors write that AI does not remove human responsibility. Design now takes more time than coding, the post says.
Microsoft published this itself about its own internal program. The page gives no numbers and no results.
Inboxsmith builds AI receptionists for small businesses. Please like and subscribe for more news.
Sources
Every claim in this video comes from the top ranking coverage of this topic. The claims and where each one came from:
- Line by line backing for all fourteen narrated sentences, in order, drawn only from the source post. HOOK sentence one, Microsoft started a program for junior engineers, it says: backed by the body sentence That's why we launched PRAISE: an internal preceptorship program that pairs junior engineers early in their careers with senior engineering preceptors. HOOK sentence two, the program is called PRAISE: backed by the same sentence naming PRAISE and by the following sentence PRAISE stands for Preceptorship for AI-accelerated Software Engineering. SCENE 1 sentence one, the internal program pairs junior and senior engineers: backed by the same launch sentence, which states the word internal and states the pairing of junior engineers with senior engineering staff. SCENE 1 sentence two, company executives wrote it: backed by the page's two bylines, Mark Russinovich, CTO, Deputy CISO and Technical Fellow, Microsoft Azure, and Scott Hanselman, VP, Member of Technical Staff, Microsoft. SCENE 2 sentence one, nursing inspired the pairing: backed by the body sentence We borrow the preceptorship concept from nursing, where new nurses are paired with experienced nurses to build real-world experience and confidence, and by the later sentence stating that, similarly to the nursing model, the key is giving junior engineers a setting in which to work through questions and problems with senior engineers, which is paraphrased and never quoted in narration. SCENE 2 sentence two, new nurses are paired with experienced nurses: backed by the first half of that same borrow sentence, quoted verbatim on screen. SCENE 3 sentence one, a curriculum partnership with Carnegie Mellon University: backed by the body sentence which states we're partnering with Carnegie Mellon University on curriculum as part of the PRAISE program. SCENE 3 sentence two, junior engineers will take those classes: backed by the body sentence Preceptees will take classes and participate in small group discussions to bridge theoretical concepts of computer science to real-world software engineering practices and their work at Microsoft. The future tense of the source is preserved as will take, and the source's own word for those engineers is carried on screen only, with narration saying junior engineers instead for transcription safety. SCENE 4 sentence one, AI does not remove human responsibility: backed by the body sentence AI changes the work; it does not remove human responsibility for outcomes. SCENE 4 sentence two, design now takes more time than coding: backed by the body sentence stating that more of the authors' time is now spent on design and architecture than coding, quoted on screen only as far as design and architecture so that no source phrasing is reused past that point. SCENE 5 sentence one, Microsoft published this itself about its own internal program: backed by the page's own label A Microsoft publication, by the two Microsoft bylines, and by the launch sentence describing the program as internal. SCENE 5 sentence two, the page gives no numbers and no results: backed by the complete absence of any figure, date, count, cost or outcome anywhere in the body, which was read end to end for this audit. ENDCARD sentence one is a statement about Inboxsmith and is not sourced to the article. ENDCARD sentence two is the fixed subscribe line and is not sourced to the article. CLAIMS DELIBERATELY LEFT UNSPOKEN for lack of support, each recorded on a NOT PUBLISHED line on screen instead: no cohort size or count of engineers; no start date or duration; no course names, course count, credit or degree detail; no cost; no productivity, code quality, hiring or retention figures; no result of any kind; and no statement that anyone outside Microsoft can join, which narration never says or implies. The embedded page video sits behind a cookie consent wall and was never viewed, the Microsoft Developer channel upload supplies the date and nothing more, and the unrelated timeline probes are used nowhere. VOICE SAFETY AUDIT. Zero numerals appear in any narration field and zero quantities are spoken anywhere in the script: the source publishes no figures, and narration keeps it that way, so the two numbers spoken close together transcription runaway cannot occur. The transcription risk token families are on screen only: preceptorship, preceptor, preceptors and preceptee appear in on screen quotations and in this sources block but in no narration field, and PRAISE is voiced once as an ordinary English word and is never spelled out letter by letter. Carnegie Mellon University is voiced exactly once, in the first sentence of scene three. No narration sentence contains a list of three or more comma separated items; every sentence carries at most one comma, and all longer enumerations are confined to on screen text, to the title candidates and to this block. No em dash, no en dash and no double hyphen appears anywhere in this file; the only hyphens present are single hyphens inside proper strings such as AI-accelerated, real-world and on-the-job, and inside the source URL. No idiom or figure of speech appears in narration or in on screen text, and the source is unusually dense with them, so every one of its figurative phrasings is reused in no field of this file, the page is described as an engineering post from a Microsoft publication and never with this publisher's own format label, and the quoted on screen line about design and architecture is cut before the source's figurative tail. The word for interrupting news, every countdown and urgency phrase, and every dotted domain brand are absent from all narration; the Inboxsmith domain appears in the endcard on screen text only and is never voiced. The date is never narrated, no narration field contains a month name or a calendar number, and the date lives only on the on screen Source lines. DISTINCT ATTRIBUTION PHRASE USED IN EACH FACTUAL SENTENCE, IN ORDER: hook sentence one uses it says; hook sentence two uses The post states; scene one sentence one uses Microsoft writes; scene one sentence two uses per that page; scene two sentence one uses The announcement explains; scene two sentence two uses the article notes; scene three sentence one uses The company reports; scene three sentence two uses the page adds; scene four sentence one uses The authors write; scene four sentence two uses the post says; and the two sentences of scene five are the disclosure, which names Microsoft as the publisher of the page about its own internal program and then states plainly that the page itself gives no numbers and no results. No attribution phrase is used twice.(Provenance note, not a real video title. The single source for this script is a first party Microsoft post titled What will the next generation of developers do when AI writes the code?, published by Command Line, which the page itself labels A Microsoft publication, dated 2026.10.15 and fetched live on October 15, 2026, the same day this Short was produced, and byte identical to the alert time snapshot. The post carries two bylines, both Microsoft employees: Mark Russinovich, CTO, Deputy CISO and Technical Fellow, Microsoft Azure, and Scott Hanselman, VP, Member of Technical Staff, Microsoft. The subject is Microsoft's own internal engineering training program, PRAISE, which the page expands as Preceptorship for AI-accelerated Software Engineering, so the page is first party promotional material about the publisher's own program and is not independent reporting; there is no outside review and no third party verification of anything on it. It IS a genuine program launch and not a recycled feature post: the body carries the launch verb in the sentence That's why we launched PRAISE, and the Carnegie Mellon curriculum work is described as current partnering with classes in the future tense. Corroboration is date only and is cited in no public facing field: Microsoft's own Microsoft Developer channel on YouTube posted a video titled PRAISE: Preceptorship for AI-accelerated Software Engineering at 15:36:26Z on the same date, which confirms the date and nothing else, and zero of five candidate transcripts could be retrieved because the installed yt-dlp build on this host cannot fetch captions, so no transcript informs any line of this script. The dated timeline probes that returned were entirely unrelated uploads, specifically an Elden Ring video, a Transformers toy video and two Chinese drama uploads, so nothing from them is used or referenced anywhere in this file. The regional screen is clean: the page is not filed under any regional newsroom category, it is a Microsoft publication from a United States company, and the only named partner, Carnegie Mellon University and its Kenneth C. Griffin School of Computer Science, is in the United States, so there is no non United States party in the story. Finally, and this is the honesty spine of the video, the page publishes no numbers at all and no outcome evidence: no cohort size, no count of participating engineers, no start date, no program duration, no course count or course names, no cost, no hiring, retention or productivity figures, and no result of any kind showing that the program works. The program is explicitly internal, pairing Microsoft's own junior engineers with Microsoft's own senior engineers, so it is not a product and not something a viewer can join, and the page says nothing about availability to anyone outside Microsoft. The page also embeds a video that sits behind a cookie consent wall, so that video was never viewed and informs nothing here.)